Quantum computer leap
phys.org
phys.org
Some problems 1) the procedure appears to require 100 percent detection of photons (there is no analysis of this in the paper). This is not practical and ends up being a source of decoherence (the very thing this paper is supposed to avoid) 2) the scheme depends for its gates and construction of a graph state (a kind of resource quantum state) on precise settings of polarized beam splitters, something which will certainly have errors and hence...decoherence again. 3) the author shows how to create a graph state but makes no mention of why this state will persist. Why won't it deco here while waiting for the necessarily adaptive measurement?
At least he's being up-front about it, but I'm a little concerned that this consistently seems to be the most prominent projected use of quantum computers. What else are they good for, besides allowing exceptionally wealthy actors to bypass our privacy protections?
Both of the above are //theoretical// applications, but the letter agencies seem to be confused about this and think they can actually computers that carry these out. All the quantum researchers working for the US military deserve a Nobel peace prize for all the money they are diverting from actual weapons and shit.
My opinion is that (3)quantum simulations of physical systems will be the most useful part of the quantum computing industry. Also, quantum optics is very cool, and could lead to higher throughput for optical communications.
Quantum simulations. Sampling from solutions to linear equations. Shit we haven't discovered yet (you be shocked at how little research there is in quantum computing looking for new algorithms)