This sounds absolutely worth the "cost." If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear; for this reason I fully embrace total surveillance, online and offline, of all citizens, 24/7.
This sounds absolutely worth the "cost." If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear; for this reason I fully embrace total surveillance, online and offline, of all citizens, 24/7.
> If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear
What if you're in a country/locale that, for example, makes same sex relationships illegal? You do have to hide it now, and so you do have to fear. Who gets to determine what has to be hidden?
That only works in a fascist or authoritarian society. People in social democratic nations have differing opinions on what is right or wrong.
This is assuming that's how it would shake out (but I don't think it really is):
Not to me. I'd rather live free in a world where crime exists than constantly watched in a world where it doesn't.