> No matter how bullish you are on the potential of AI, it's horrifying and categorically unethical to use them to decide who to kill.

Is it any more horrifying or unethical to decide without AI?

> It creates the possibility of atrocity with no accountability.

Who was held accountable for hiroshima? Or do you know how much atrocities were committed to create israel? You act like we had accountability before AI. We've never had accountability for atrocities. Just victor's 'justice'.

AI can be better than humans when it comes to atrocities. It can be as bad as humans, But it can never be worse. Humans set the standard.