People say that if public libraries didn't already exist and were proposed today as a new thing, they'd be found illegal.
I agree that they've sort of lost the plot by taking this digital lending stuff seriously.
I agree that they've sort of lost the plot by taking this digital lending stuff seriously.
ARPANET was gracefully turned over, for the most part, to the commons, as was GPS. Public libraries are a millenium old as a concept [1], but only half a century (EDIT: millenium) old as a continuous practice [2]. We're not at the tail end of a collective-action halcyon; we're in the centre of it.
So instead of the Seattle Library, it would be the some big tech nonprofit at best that would lisence content in bulk.