Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act
congress.gov
congress.gov
The bill itself does single out ByteDance presumably to ensure that they have no way of skirting around the whole Foreign Adversary Controlled thing, but separately from that, the bill is pretty specific around how it's determining whether an app is owned or beneficially controlled by a country that's an adversary of the United States.
Specifically:
> (4) FOREIGN ADVERSARY COUNTRY.—The term “foreign adversary country” means a country specified in section 4872(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code.
The related section: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/4872
I wonder if someone could make a plausible "bills of attainder" argument.