You mean the CEO that had nearly nothing to do with turning it into an innovative company?
If you compare the Jobs 2.0 Apple to the 1990s Apple, improved operational execution (supply channel management, demand forecasting, etc) made a huge impact on the bottom line.
That's pretty impressive for an R&D focused company.
That's subsidized, for what it's worth.
I think Tim has convinced Jobs that operation and execution is all part of the product experience.
Assuming you're in your thirties: A man that has worked at Apple since you were a late teenager, in several leadership positions, has far more to do with what the company is today than your pithy comment.