> Originally developed entirely by ChatGPT, this locally hosted web application has evolved to encompass a comprehensive set of features, addressing all your PDF requirements.
Well that's that then.
Well that's that then.
It was initially created as a 24 hour challenge to make a full app with chatgpt 3.0 in a set time limit to test what chatgpt was like last year.
I posted on Reddit it got lots of demand and I turned it into a full app,the only full chatgpt was the first 24 hours, it's over a year later now
Even being sympathetic, my thought reading this was "probably bad code quality/rotten core despite the great feature set".
You can have a "History/Background/Origin" section where you put exactly what you wrote in your comment and it will be fine.
This notwithstanding, thank you very much for developing this app! I will look into deploying it on my server, it will be of great help to people around me who often need manipulating PDFs but are not super technical!
1) don't expose it to public internet
2) don't give it untrusted input
Which highly reduces the usability factor for me.
In this case I think the actual PDF bits are command line tools written by humans though, and just the web wrapping (some small initial piece of it) is originally from ChatGPT.
So yeah.
Leetcode is a meaningless metric when evaluating application developers.
This was an example of how I gave a LLM clear instructions on a function that is known to the internet. If I told you get to use google you probably could solve this "leetcode" task in 10 minutes.
So I picked a random known algorithm and asked ChatGPT to write a function with it, just to test it.
I agree that leetcode is a useless metric, but nobody informed me that something simple like cubic interpolation belongs to this.category now. Maybe I should re-evaluate my career.
LLMs don't have perfect recall, so it has to reconstructtthe answer from the information it retained from training. Your example is like asking it math problems: unless it had both seen and retained the specific one you've asked it, it can't answer correctly because doesn't have the capability to reason about the problem and solve it. But something like writing a web app is closer to writing a story, where each next block it spits out doesn't have to be exactly correct, it just has to get the job done.
As for leetcode, I guess it depends on your field, but my logic is this: if I came to an interview and was told to write a microservice that receives a POSTed file, extracts some data and puts it in a DB, that's a solid work-relevant skill test. But if they asked to to write some interpolation functions, I'd consider that a leetcode interview - closer to math than programming, not a good indicator of job ability, not representative of the kind of work I'll be doing.