Hacker News Reader

Do any of those alternative responses to my already-answered rhetorical questions change the fact that the fruits held by rich owners ended up on the tables of the poor?

I have literally no idea what you're doing with that metaphor in the last paragraph.

View on HN

What I'm saying is that if you don't have good reason to think some vastly wealthy thing isn't building a giant cock sucking device then you should assume it is in fact building supreme cock sucker and not you or anyone will get in the way.

And?

What does this metaphor have to do with "will the rich let poor people have medical treatment"?

Given that the rich are, as I have demonstrated via the example of Gates, donating money to make sure the poor have medical treatment, along with all the other examples I gave of the rich being forced to help the poor even when they don't do so voluntarily.

Weak examples which are utterly penetrated by the inevitable phallus.

Sufficient examples.

You asked "Why would the owners of this technology ever share it with you?"

Because of all the reasons they already do.

Bilk Gates infected you with windows, perhaps some sort of parasitic control is causing you to believe it was mutually beneficial.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com