Yes it is. They have low to no journalistic standards in that edition and it's heavily propagandized depending on their agenda. Their entire reputation is based on the Western version as "look we use those standards everywhere" which is definitely not true.
Where’s the proof to back your statement? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
I believe you, but I too would like a citation that I can share with others - even a blog post with some examples would be helpful.
"anti-infidel version" - Godwin's Law but descending to Islamophobia.
CNN has two versions too, one for US audiences and one for the world.
I’m pretty sure that’s more normal than not for news orgs that have a home country or region but also compete on the global market. Some have several versions, not just two.
The Guardian is known for having such different takes on transgender rights in their US and British editions that the US employees complained.