Wikipedia: How many legs does a horse have?

en.wikipedia.org

2 pointsolooney2 comments

Lot's of good meta Wikipedia articles, but this is one of the most deranged. Sounds exactly like something that - an unpaid remote moderator who spends all day inside and interacts with people only in the context of dispute resolution and through a bulletin system from the dot com boom - would write.

They've made a good point, though: when making an argument, don't forget to bring your evidence [0].

[0] Otherwise, you have a list of abstract grievances with maddening uses of "we" and "they" weasel words and zero concrete examples: https://coryd.dev/posts/2024/the-tech-industry-doesnt-deserv...

Reply on news.ycombinator.com