Agreed, although the language still feels like a tech demo. They don't even have a package manager yet. I'm curious and hopeful to see what it looks like in a year
They have their own version called struct which works in a very similar way. I feel like this should be mentioned when saying that `class` support didn't yet exist
Yes, you're right and struct is _the_ interesting part about mojo and is enough to write interesting things in it.
Floodgates will open though once class is also supported.