Hacker News Reader

Comment by tambourine_man | Hacker News Reader

>… macos coworkers and they have a single application on fullscreen…

They are probably recent ex-Windows users struggling to understand a superficially similar but profoundly different WIMP paradigm.

>… then they shake their mouse or whatever and 20 windows fly over the screen

The fact that they can’t handle Mission Control is another tell-tale

View on HN

Mac OS itself confuses things by forcing apps to be full screen, rather than sizing to the content

> Mac OS itself confuses things by forcing apps to be full screen, rather than sizing to the content

I don't understand what you mean.

macOS has never forced apps to be full screen.

It doesn't force applications to be fullscreen, but it does have garbage tooling for managing multiple windows on the screen simultaneously. Even windows has better with hotkeys and gestures for snapping to parts of the screen.

Mac OS originally didn’t have the concept of full screen (expect for games, pro software) or tiling. Its floating, overlapping and spatially oriented windows blew people's minds. It was coherent and wonderfully executed, both powerful and simple, I miss it dearly.

During the OS X brain transplant and particularly after Lion it became a hybrid that’s neither here or there, unfortunately.

You can option click the green button, but I agree, one of the major regressions from Lion, IIRC, that we haven’t recovered from yet.

Sadly by the looks of some of the replies here, never will recover from, since people seem unaware that it never used to do that, and would delightfully size itself to the content. This is the #1 feature that I really loved about Mac OS window management.

I love the terminal and use vim as my primary text editor but I can't remember the last time Mac OS full-screened an app for me unless I told it to. I drive most of my mac through keyboard shortcuts and minimal pointer interaction. Perhaps a mouse-first Mac users are forced into full-screen? That still doesn't sound right though.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com