> The hospital said it had “no indication” his death was related to the transplant.
Additionally, the transplant happened in March, which is “weeks ago” but not 2 weeks ago, which is the timeframe I initially assumed from the headline.
Additionally, the transplant happened in March, which is “weeks ago” but not 2 weeks ago, which is the timeframe I initially assumed from the headline.
I was born more than 2000 weeks ago.
That bit of the headline is just pointless.
Mathematically true isn't sufficient (and possibly sometimes not even relevant), "weeks ago" bears more meaning in common language than "there exists N such that N > 2 and N weeks passed".
So you were born that many weeks ago, but not really weeks ago.
What matters is how things are understood and it's not usually the interpretation of a formal version of the text (or it is, but a complex one that depends on the mood, the culture and the knowledge of the recipient, their understanding of the author, possibly on other factors as well, that most likely doesn't quite match a naive formal translation)