Couch hacking - A proof of Ikea's excellence
lengrand.fr
lengrand.fr
I know that Ikea's instruction style has been intensely influential in the home furniture business when I go buy a set of curtain rods at a different store, or an "assembly required" vacuum cleaner at a garage supply store and they all feature copies of what look like Ikea instructions. Simple line-art, no words (saving having to print assembly instructions in 11 languages) etc.
And then when I set out to actually follow the instructions is the brilliance of Ikea's instruction design made clear. Curtain rod instructions? I have almost no idea what they are trying to convey to me, random screws and indecipherable brackets make putting them up a chore. Vacuum wasn't much better, I'm still not sure I have the right hose in the right place.
But put together an 1100 piece Ikea drawer unit? It's as much fun, and as simple, as building a Lego Millennium Falcon -- and they've managed to describe the process unambiguously, and in only as many steps as necessary (around 30). Each little connector is absolutely clear, the shape and sides of similar looking pieces are obvious, multiple steps (when absolutely clear), are combined into one.
The instruction manuals are virtually parts of a piece of audience participation performance art.
Cookbooks get dinged for this all the time... recipes are often not pre-tested before placement in many cookbooks, such that some now feature on the cover "Every recipe tested in our kitchens". It becomes apparent when cookbooks list common errors (yes, even expert chefs make common errors) or ways to fix bad outcomes or ingredient substitutions which actually still taste good.
It all looks so simple, til you get the curtain rod instructions (agreed!) or a non-tested cookbook.
Some items are indeed crap, and I won't buy them (especially in their first version). But some others, including office chairs suit me well. I bought 3 of them at least, and never experienced any problem.
The lack table will surely break soon, but what do you exactly expect from a 10 bucks table ? :)
I don't know exactly out of France, but the other furniture stores are usually more expensive, and offer crappier stuff than Ikea. (As long as you don't search for a 200 euro table of course).
Investing in a proper (edit: very good quality) office chair for my development rig was certainly one of the best investments I made. I don't know if you've seen it, but if not I suggest to take a look at http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2008/07/investing-in-a-qual...
I used to have this one (the older version, with better back support) http://www.ikea.com/fr/fr/catalog/products/00146677/
But with my new flat, I still dont have much furniture and use this (shame on me I know :)). http://www.ikea.com/fr/fr/catalog/products/50221711/
I might search for a really nice chair in several months though. I would probably go for something like this : http://www.ikea.com/fr/fr/catalog/products/S19896843/.
In my opinion, best back support is simply not to stay hours without getting up on the same chair. The yoga position keeps your (or at least mine) back automatically in a correct position.
I don't think I've ever seen (or at least noticed) any of Ikea's higher quality options. The price differences just seem like normal price variation between models to me. Is there any way to tell that a particular item is from their better line?
That said, I think I paid something like $150 for my Jerker desk and it's still going strong seven years and five moves later.
I just got back from a trip to Ikea to buy multiple computer desks, and got the really cheap particle board ones to save money, but there were definitely some nicer desks there that looked even better that felt like real wood.
It really depends on what you get, the fake wood tables definitely don't last (though they're no worse than most "fake wood" alternatives using woodchips, you won't get those to last either).
And I recently got a bunch of expedit units[0], it's fakewood but it feels extremely sturdy, especially the "sides" (heavy as fuck too). I don't know how well they survive moving, but the part was cheap and doesn't feel cheap.
Really, they've got pretty much all the range, you can find cheap stuff that won't last and more expensive stuff which will. And their integration and parts are really clever (for expedit parts for instance, there are something like a dozen "basket"-type things which fit perfectly in the slots but can also be used as independent baskets with no issue, from the $5 "drona" which is just some tissue over cardboard — sufficient for laundry — to the $15+ pjas or knipsa woven baskets with metal structure which feel extremely solid)
> Most of their office chairs are crap and do no last.
Then again I can say that for all office chairs I've seen under $150. Love having screws digging in my ass after 2 weeks due to the shitty foam seat.
Ikea uses the same materials as the other manufacturers when talking about cheap furniture, it just uses it better :).
So I was able to sell a expedit after three moves.
The kitchen in our home is a pure IKEA Showroom. Even the 40mm realwood top. that did cost about 300 $. We would have paid 2000 - 2500 $, if we would have ordered that one at a kitchen store. The whole kitchen didn't cost that much. You can buy cheap at IKEA. But you can also buy good stuff there. It costs a little bit more, but most times it really lasts.
and: We had a problem once with missing parts. What do I say. A Problem? NO, went ti IKEA, told the service desk, what the issue was, left 5 minutes later with all parts and to vouchers for free coffee.
Well, let me tell you my experience! When we moved I took apart our 5x5 Expedit shelving unit. When I had to put it back together, the heavy top shelf turned out to be bent upwards in the middle. It was only a few centimeters. I decided to unbend it with my foot, and through the resulting hole I found out that the Expedit are actually cardboard inside :)
Still, it's perfectly fine (there's books on top of the hole anyway), and straight again.
The good part is that the desktop costs a lot less than the whole desk, it's always in stock and it takes 5 minutes with a screwdriver to change.
The thin-box design is smart, it makes it very light, and the cardboard hex structure deadens resonance, so it doesn't sound like a "cheap" box, even if it is one. A lot like how car doors have sound deadening to give them a solid, satisfying thump, instead of a cheap, high frequency ring when you close them.
I found that the desk I have has some resonance with a Sony all in desktop pc I had. Was solved by putting a couple of glue gun glue blobs on the bottom of the unit.
Was slightly annoying.
Then you can have a 3m long desk for $50 that will hold an array of large CRTs
Another IKEA-item I'm really impressed by is the simple NJUTA shampoo containers: http://www.ikea.com/dk/da/catalog/products/70192699/ - what impresses me is how they have shaped the container such that it can be stored in different ways depending on your bathroom: standing on the lid, hanging from a hook or squeezed in between the wall and the water pipe.
Now I'm buying shampoo based on the shape of the container.
Plus half the furniture into something else hacks seem to be from IKEA, so maybe they just design it with the idea in mind that it'll end up as part of a rackmount setup or something.
Other companies are trying to mimic the flat pack business model. However the overall shopping environment, forcible furniture, warranties make them standout.
The sofa is just one example of adaptable furniture. One limitation though is their bed and mattress products. They have different dimensions (unique to ikea) and therefore you need an ikea mattress for a perfect fit.
Are you in a country that uses imperial measures? I have an IKEA Mattress, in a non-IKEA Habitat bedframe, that uses the same non-standard (in the UK) sizes. I assumed it was just a metric standard from continental Europe.
From pressboard panels, where the slightest overtweak of connectors causes permanent damage, to undersized drawers that fall off of slides, to the inevitable missing parts, the stuff is garbage. It looks nice in the showroom maze and it's inexpensive but you definitely get what you pay for. Maybe even less than that.
And yes its disposable. It cannot take the abuse of moving from one apartment to another.
Ikea has a pretty big range of furniture, and some of it is made out of actual wood; maybe that makes the difference.
$699. Not too bad. Much cheaper than I remember Ikea. Now to look for the Australian Price. Can't be too much more than that. $1299. And that's why I bought a 2nd hand leather couch off gumtree for $200.
Personally, I really like their design - clean, functional and to the point.
Experience showed that they absolutely don't. The Manstad is 100$ cheaper in France than it is in the US.
Remember as well that the French price presumably includes 20% vat while the US price will be +sales tax.
I left a marriage and a fully furnished house behind me, but my old couch is one of the things I regret the most, it was just perfect :) That, and the dish-washer, someone should write a poem or build a statue for the person who invented/perfected this wonderful piece of machinery.
Depending on your viewpoint, it's either insanely brilliant or morally bankrupt: the vast majority of Ikea's revenue goes to the INGKA Foundation, a charity which ostensible supports 'innovation in the field of architecture', but only gives 0.2% of its total equity to charitable causes each year.
It makes the fairly standard tax avoidance measures carried out by tech companies like Apple or Vodafone look amateur by comparison!
ps this is exactly the same sort of scam (double Irish rather than dutch sandwich) used by Google/HP/MSFT/Dell and every other company operating in Europe
Setting up holding companies in EU to pay minimal tax is standard practice: creating a 'charitable organisation' absolutely isn't. Ikea is a very unique, and in some ways innovative, example of creative accounting.
According to Wikipedia, the royalties -- 3% of the revenue or about €630M -- are taxed, but the company receiving the royalties claims €590M in operating expenses paid out to another company (owned by the same people). Together, those two companies pay about €19M in taxes.
Apart from the royalties, lots of money goes into that infamous "non-profit", I'll quote from the Wikipedia page: The net profit of IKEA Group (which does not include Inter IKEA systems) in fiscal year 2009 (after paying franchise fees to Inter IKEA systems) was €2.538 billion on sales of €21.846 billion. Because INGKA Holding is owned by the nonprofit INGKA Foundation, none of this profit is taxed. The foundation's nonprofit status also means that the Kamprad family cannot reap these profits directly, but the Kamprads do collect a portion of IKEA sales profits through the franchising relationship between INGKA Holding and Inter IKEA Systems.
Regarding the non-profit: estimated net worth of $36B, most of the Group's profit is spent on investments, the foundation expects to spend €45 million on charitable giving in 2010 (the slightly smaller Gates foundation spent $1.5B in 2005).
We ended up purchasing a down mattress pad (for ~15% of the price of the couch) for when it is used as a bed and it makes it bearable as a bed, but now we have to store the mattress pad in the couch itself.
After living with the couch for a year I would happily pay twice as much for a similar design that is executed better. Unfortunately no such thing exists as far as I can tell!
On the other hand, IKEA operates under the ownership of non-profit establishment using sleazy tricks to avoid taxes.