If you fix that, then people might take it more seriously. At the moment it looks more like you have an axe to grind.
If you fix that, then people might take it more seriously. At the moment it looks more like you have an axe to grind.
Well of course they do. The whole point of the argument is that LFJ is so hellbent on trying to take Josh's site down in any and all ways possible, every single day, continually for years, and people are letting them get away with it. They both have axes to grind with each other.
He doesn't allow doxxing out of a commitment to free speech. The forum doesn't actually have that much free speech. If you criticize him you will get banned pretty fast.
There isn't much transparency either. Banned users aren't marked as being banned. And bans are often done without public notification. So unlike most forums, you can't tell if someone has been banned.
> He doesn't allow doxxing
Which is it? Not sure what you are getting at here.
To rephrase that sentence: Free speech isn't the reason he allows doxing on the forum.
An example: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/JcaLQ
I don't think a free speech absolutist would secretly ban people for criticizing him.