not sure how is that relevant?
Meanwhile, "autumn" is a loan word from French. "Autumn" and "fall" were both used in Britain, but "autumn" eventually won out (after the colonization of North America).
"Fall" (along with its counterpart "spring") was commonly used in Britain when America was colonized. The British later stopped using "fall" (although they did keep "spring") and switched completely over to "autumn". But Americans never made that switch and continue to use both terms just as their British ancestors did.
"Fall" never replaced "autumn". It replaced "harvest" (just as "spring" replaced "lent"). "Autumn" was borrowed from French, and then "fall" and "autumn" existed side by side for hundreds of years in Britain, up until very recently when "autumn" replaced "fall".
Why did so many English speakers stop using "fall", a proper English word with a very long history in Britain, and switch to using a French word for it instead?
For that matter, why didn't they do the same for "spring" when it is so closely linked to "fall"? It seems very silly.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acad%C3%A9mie_Fran%C3%A7aise
But not in charge of the german, nor english language.
So trains resonate as a point of pride in a way they might not without historical context.