Both of your references use RRF=1/(60+Rank)
So I'm not sure why the article uses 1/Rank alone. Did you test both and find that the smoothing didn't help? My understanding is that it has been pretty important for the best results.
So I'm not sure why the article uses 1/Rank alone. Did you test both and find that the smoothing didn't help? My understanding is that it has been pretty important for the best results.
We used 1/Rank in the article for simplicity purposes, though I can see why this might be confusing to an astute reader.