There's also kind of an odd contradiction. This is an idea you don't like, and suggesting it should be stopped.
We can tell "organic" from "forced", perhaps, but then the results will not be pretty for any political camp.
And yet a lot of contributors here see no difference between that and factual information or honest reportage. It’s distressing that so many people seem to swim in this mire of relativity, and see calls for truthfulness and adherence to reality as some sort of sin, an admission of bias and a desire to suppress the other side.
The problem is not so much in the research itself, but that it is presented and reported unaware or indifferent to those events.