I read the comments just expecting yours. Something must obviously bad if Dijkstra says so, right? We don't have to think for ourselves anymore if the god of CS himself has banned something, right?
Sure, goto was abused, but it's no worse than (or even better than) using continuations or using break and continue.
Any of those mysterious jump-to-somewhere-else code features resemble goto. Not that I don't think they clean up some nesting issues, but they're pretty much the same thing as goto.
Too bad, because it's the only sensible advice in the whole post.