Hacker News Reader

Comment by eviks | Hacker News Reader

This is tolerated because this is pervasive, and throwing stones in a glass house is neither safe nor rewarding

It’s probably pervasive in second and third tier research universities. It’s not pervasive in top-tier universities. Actually it’s probably not pervasive in either case, but it happens more in the former.

Stanford and Harvard just had incidents where their own top researchers got caught doing academic dishonesty of the highest order. The ivy leagues are not doing citation cartels particularly less than tier two or tier three schools.

Comparing the recent news from Harvard to the long-running scandal at Stanford doesn't seem like a fair comparison.

wasn't it the President of Stanford recently?

They had two (or a small number of) high-profile incidents. There have been thousands and thousands of researchers at those Universities during the tenure of those specific researchers. I'm open to an argument that these behaviors are more widespread than the 1/10,000 that these numbers would suggest. But even if it's 10x or 100x worse, that's still around 1%. Not "pervasive."

It's the other way around - this behaviour is so normalized and so common, that it's outright not reported on because it's such a part of daily academic work.

You have evidence for small rates of fraud, but you have feelings that suggest the numbers are enormous? And nobody reports on outright fraud? This is not my experience, and certainly not even remotely scientific.

Bruh lol. Thinking it doesn't happen at "top tier" universities is like thinking because the rich don't need to steal they don't. When in reality they steal just as much because why not.

I just finished my PhD at a "top tier" university. Everyone plays the same exact tricks. My group all self-cited and our collaborators and back and forth.

So there's no such thing as "top tier" as far as the quality goes, there's only higher paid.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com