I have no idea where you're getting your information, but you seem out of touch. The widespread mockery they received for their "generous price freeze" on no name items was virtually unanimous.
You cede your position on the stock details and only respond to a small mostly unrelated sentence.
I collected my information from the Toronto stock exchange.
>The widespread mockery they received for their "generous price freeze" on no name items was virtually unanimous.
This is another thing which I never saw. Not very widespread obviously. Especially given investor sentiment toward loblaws.
So the Liberals taking a ton of heat over causing high inflation, amended the competition act, in september, to temporarily force grocery stores to freeze pricing. https://openparliament.ca/bills/44-1/C-56/
There was no specific against loblaws factor here, but it wasn't loblaws doing this out of the kindness of their heart.
It's interesting how out of touch you seem to be. I've provided sourcing along the way here.
It's very interesting how much damage these echo chambers are doing to democracy. How has the governments not essentially banned all this censorship?