> If it appears human, we will develop a false sense of trust. But you can never trust it as you would trust a human.
People already trust eg their (mechanical) cars and their hammers and saws.
And humans aren't all that trustworthy, either.
People already trust eg their (mechanical) cars and their hammers and saws.
And humans aren't all that trustworthy, either.
People trust the people who make them, that's why brand value is so important and why "I only buy good old <country of choice> hammers" is so common. It's also why Sam Altman wanted his AI to sound like totally not Scarlett Johansson rather than give it the voice of a Dalek.
If anything, OpenAI should've paid homage to the works that defined the genre, and made the voice sound like Majel Barrett-Roddenberry.
Completely unrelated and irrelevant.
> And humans aren't all that trustworthy, either.
That may be kind of the point. But humans have consequences, generally speaking.
WHy? It seems like an appropriate analogy to me.
The analogy makes no sense.