The attitude I see a lot (mostly by Americans and Western Europeans) is that "Crypto is not useful to me, therefor it is not useful to anyone" - forgetting that it's a global network open to everyone and anyone. And that other countries exist that are difficult places to live at times.
If your government is going as far to prevent you to own USD, they aren't going to view cryptocurrencies any more favorably anyways.
Instead of dollar bills for peso bills you exchange a crypto transaction for peso bills.
Circumventing policies of a government deemed defective can help on the short terms and narrow perspective, but it won’t fix the fundamental issue.
Currency, be it banker’s bill, digital crytowhatever, are just a marginal side apparatus here.
I’m not an Economist, and I have no idea of what Fernando de la Rua had as insight of outcomes for his decisions. What should have the government tried to stop a precipitating bank run? Would a world where everywhere would follow maraoz economical wishes be a better necessarily a better one?
Exactly this. People in these countries really don't know the problems from the rest of the world.
When an international fintech player get into market (TransferWise, PayPal, etc) they always optimize the experience for users from the US and western EU first. I doubt many people know you can't send money to Ukraine via Paypal unless you mark the transaction as "for Friends or Family", which means you lose all the customer protection. Paypal is worse than crypto in almost every aspect in this case.
It is a possibility. The US's debt payments are a similar order of magnitude to their military spending and there is not really a scenario where the principle will get paid back in real terms. And the US's net international investment position is eyewatering. It isn't obvious that the money was well spent in the negative interest rate years, although maybe there has been a lot of capital formation in the US that flew under my radar it is early days yet of positive interest rates.
We're also probing at a big war and there are real questions over what the US will do to USD holdings in the event that risk materialises. We all see what is happening to Russia's assets.
It isn't particularly obvious that the USD is a safer currency in the abstract than the Argentine Peso. Certainly as a foreigner it looks a bit risky. It might also become unreliable for internal use, the debt situation or a political blow up are both ways it could go bad. The situation is something of a spectacle.