The author is in danger of being called anti-semitic as this definition fits the wrong group of people.
> Example: Hitler came to power by putting forward the conspiracy theory the Jews are solely responsible for all of Germany’s issues [1] and that repressing them would solve them. And so when repressions didn’t do lead to any improvement (by the way, jews were less than 1% of the population[2] of Germany) all he could do in order not to expose himself as a fraud was to repress them even more.
In my understanding, the definition hence covers literal Nazis, but not really the author?
I'm confused as to which group of people you're referring to.