That's not right.
"Settlement" does really say a judge oversaw the entire thing while a corporation bullied somebody working for the public interest into silence.
"Settlement" does really say a judge oversaw the entire thing while a corporation bullied somebody working for the public interest into silence.
If you're implying that the judge was somehow complicit in helping OceanGate ('oversaw', meaning presided over and made decisions concerning), then please provide evidence of that?
So it's not a single judge, but the Judiciary Power collectively was absolutely complicit on the deed.