This flies directly in the face of technologies such as Deep Blue and AlphaGo. They excel in tiny domains previously thought to be the pinnacle of intelligence, and now they dominate humans. Are they AGI in your definition?
Edit: I think maybe the disagreement here is about the nature of evidence. I think there can be evidence that something is AGI even if it isn't, in fact, AGI. You seem to believe that if there's any evidence that something is AGI, it must be AGI, I think?