Edit. Unless I am missing something, I see no mention of Van Goghs sighting grid. Crude, but effective.
http://www.vangoghreproductions.com/art-techniques/perspecti...
Edit. Unless I am missing something, I see no mention of Van Goghs sighting grid. Crude, but effective.
http://www.vangoghreproductions.com/art-techniques/perspecti...
Can you recommend books or other resources that use your approach (or similar)?
However, I did put together some material on the subject. I'm not sure how useful it is (some of it could have been better written).
My module on perspective: https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/87565/modules/699526
My module on drawing: https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/87565/modules/696832
...in which I address transference (i.e. projection): https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/87565/modules/items/328...
> Can you recommend books or other resources that use your approach (or similar)?
Drawing 100 years ago is pretty much the same as now. Here are a bunch of great (free) books all over 40 years old, yet still valid.
https://rmit.instructure.com/courses/87565/pages/drawing-fre...
My approach is not significantly different to that which most competent drawing teachers would employ. However, I believe that my use of language is a bit more consistent and exact than most artists, who tend to be a bit hand-wavey in their language usage. Practices that are termed one thing in 'book a' are termed something completely different in 'book b'. I learned the value of consistency and exactitude from collaborating with computer engineers, which is one reason I like lurking in HN.