> There will always be angry customers.
There will always be companies that make their customers angry. You're really going against people seeking solutions from companies they pay?
I'm amazed anyone would downvote this - how am I disillusion here?
There will always be companies that make their customers angry. You're really going against people seeking solutions from companies they pay?
I'm amazed anyone would downvote this - how am I disillusion here?
That's the straw man. I don't see anything in the parent comment that implies or expresses that. It says
1. "There will always be a subset of people who act irate or abusively for external reasons", not 2. "All people who are irate or abusive due to external reasons"
Your flipping the implication within the sentence, then arguing against that