It not "hardly the language philosophy", it's the language philosophy stripped of the ego-fluffing layer of marketing to language end-users.
> In short, Go is not just a programming language. Of course it is a programming language, that's its definition, but its purpose was to help provide a better way to develop high-quality software, at least compared to our environment 14 plus years ago.
> And that's still what it's about today. Go is a project to make building production software easier and more productive.
I think there is an idea that Go is "software engineering for the masses", and that's why the word "easier" is used, and not "simpler". "easier" is fine when you're starting out and you don't know what you don't know. As times goes on, you start understanding more because you have more experience, and so you may yearn for something simpler, with less abstractions, more control. Go isn't the best language for this, but it's also far from the worst.
I take that to mean that they're searchers, not researchers. I.e., "Googlers" here means they use Google to search for answers, not that they're Google employees.
[1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTrP_EmGNmw (quote is at 20:30)