Then again, if Firefox had refused to implement DRM, I'd probably have switched to Chrome by now, so there's that.
I'm really not a fan of DRM, but I don't think it's fair to blame Firefox for doing what probably a huge part of their user base demands, especially given their pretty dire usage stats. Sometimes, there's wisdom in knowing which battle to pick.
I think if that click was right at netflix and a ff restart away from working, then maybe yes. But most people would just switch browsers, before looking for that patch.
I do get the ideological objection to not wanting to support DRM, although I don't think that's the battle that Mozilla should pick right now. But extra clicks probably wouldn't make anybody who does happy, while inconveniencing most other users.
And what Mozilla should do right now is rather reemploy the servo team(and more), to actually build a innovative browser again.
But I wouldn't choose DRM as the hill to die on. There's probably better examples of things Mozilla did wrong.