Evidence of political bias in English-language Wikipedia articles
manhattan.institute
manhattan.institute
It's not surprising to see George W Bush so low, because I think both sides have turned against George Bushes neo-conservative interventionism, and Trump, regardless of how you evaluate his policies or leadership is a negative sentiment machine. Trump is the anti-Reagen in terms of his approach, and in general I would say the Republican strategy of the past decades has been oriented around a more negative sentiment.
So yeah, maybe a different methodology is required or something that takes this into account?
How do you cover Trump in a fair way without including words that bias towards a negative sentiment? Without ever quoting him?