Allowing people to challenge unfair government policies in court seems like a great result. There will probably be unanticipated second order effects, but on the face of it, this seems like a logical decision.
Austen Allred posted a defense of getting rid of Chevron, but in a lot of ways, this seems like it could have the opposite impact that he predicts, this makes predicting legal outcomes even harder for small companies and it may further benefit large companies that can understand the nuances of how all the different judges will respond.