UK's Housing Crisis Needs a London-Sized City to Fix It
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
Although if you're Idris Elba post fame you'll be fine .. just don't ask him what it was like growing up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8dAdZGtkg8
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/mar/21/metropolitan...
The ethnicities you listed experience racism and xenophobia across europe, the UK is not exceptional in this regard (the nationality perhaps a little more casual xenophobia than they do on the continent but then most brits are at least part Irish).
I'm not sure the guardian or a youtube video count as references, the WVS might be a better place to start but there is no shortage of empirical (albeit this is a socially scientific topic) sources.
If the US didn't have immigrants, we would have almost no capacity to build anything. Immigrants are the backbone of the construction trade.
One of the surest signs property prices are going to get crazy high is when blue collar immigrants are no longer able live in the area. You need a plumber? They live 5 hours away. Wait in line.
Population growth is only very tangentially related to property prices. Plenty of examples of places with high population growth, but reasonable prices.
But when you don't have a strong supply of construction labor, you're in a bad, bad spot.
How reliant is the UK on immigrants for construction?
was talking about this with a friend who knows more. He did point out we need to replace old housing stock, which we also don't do, so just have cold, mouldy old houses. But that's not what's being talked about here.
I also had a twitter conv with a housing charity once, who agreed but pointed out that the financialization of property is hard to overturn, and it's easier to just advocate for more building. Problem I see here is that the new buildings will just be more stock for existing portfolios, and actual prices don't seem to reduce.
i myself am 29 and live with two other guys in london, our rent is collectively over £3k for a shoddy built-to-rent flat. looking at house prices in the uk, it's hard to think i'll ever own my own home.
What you are suggesting is the opposite what they are trying to do
This would necessitate larger than desired tax increases on the politically influential.
Solution: Reduce the quantity and quality of benefits as much as politically possible, but also import more working hands to reduce labor prices. That it helps support asset price increases is just an added benefit.
No, it’s just very basic (completely orthodox) supply/demand economics
Record immigration allowed, without anywhere near the housing to support it
Australia also has an obsession with property speculation as a tax efficient investment with capital gains discounts and negative gearing.
Property in Australia isn’t about owning a home, it’s about having an investment.
Pretty much all houses in Australia are sold at auction. It’s impossible to get an accurate guide price. Every dark pattern is used to maximise sale price at auction. The auctions them selves are something of a spectacle with real estate agents acting as minor celebrities.
So much wealth in Australia is now in property, anything that reduces property value such as building more homes, increasing supply, abolishing negative gearing and capital gains discounts is political suicide. Prosperity owners in Australia have become dependent on the next owner paying more than the current owner to cover negative gearing and make a profit via capital gains. Text book definition of a pyramid scheme.
Builders are land banking drip feeding supply. Why increase supply selling for less when they can maximise value by artificially limit supply.
Then current own homers are a bunch of middle class NIMBYS. I live in a suburb the NSW government announced has a high priority suburb to build high density as it is along a rail route. Perfect place to build along a rail route with access to the city, central coast etc. The locals don’t want it.
Sydney is now the second most expensive place to live in the world. It’s property problems has a lot more to it than immigration.
I'm old, I benefit from this .. not that I want to.
I'm interested in more housing, available and affordable housing - it's difficult to say the least to move policy in that direction; people agree that it's desirable but somehow every attempt to to take action forwards gets blocked or otherwise shutdown in councils that have been captured by real estate lobby groups and builders that are profiting from upper middle class estates, etc.
Are you planning on selling and downsizing to a vastly overpriced apartment? One that would probably end up costing as much as a house because the bottom end has been squeezed?
Because that's the only way you'll realise the price increase, and you'll mostly lose it due to everything else being overpriced. Unless you don't actually mean "not that I want to".
The value to me is a rear granny flat I can stay in for free | lend out to friends in the capital on a block with a house I got a kick out of rebuilding and now rent out at discount rates to students, etc. and rural land about the state, some near the ocean, that pays it's own way and can be lived on as I move about.
However, immigration has massively exacerbated and accelerated all of the problems above since COVID.
The only thing you can blame Maggie for in this chart is what comes after 1989, which is when she introduced policy (suggested by Viscount Monckton) that allowed people in social housing to buy their homes from government for the first time.
Clearly this wasn't a Biden policy, but it wasn't really a Trump policy either. It was a WHO/WEF policy that was force-fed to everyone, and supported by all Democrats and most Republicans. A major mistake that policy-makers all over the world still refuse to acknowledge. You can dig up the news articles from 2020 where they're saying "It won't cause inflation," in 2021 where they deny inflation is happening, and in 2022 where they say "it's transitory." Constant gaslighting from governments and media alike. I've described this before: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32645544, and also predicted it would happen when it was being proposed, but of course, I'm wrong, according to everyone who did not predict it.
She was the opposition leader from 1975 and was using monetarist arguments to "fix" a problem that was purely geopolitical (Oil crisis). Would you be fine with extremist parties today suggesting the inflation due to the War in Ukraine being due to bad management(and not the war)? That's what Thatcher did.
>You can also see that during the Blair years, house building declines at an even more rapid rate than during the previous Conservative government.
The entire point of Blair is that he was a Thatcherite through and through on economics. The "Third Way" is Thatcher economics with "social justice" slapped on top.
Easy money -> weak economy.
https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/
How to cure inflation: https://www.freetochoosenetwork.org/programs/free_to_choose/...
http://archive.today/2024.06.25-155719/https://www.bloomberg...
Also posted 14 hours ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40835727
[0]: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/net-supply-of-hous...