He did not understand bears, just saw them how he wanted them to be and actually did them a severe disservice!
Going outside of you comfort zone is valuable though, but only if done with knowledge of your own limits and consequences!
e.g. I live in the Alps and we have much too many stupid tourists' emergencies in the mountains due to ignorance than should be. They know nothing about the mountains, the tour, how weather is up there, what equipment and clothing to bring and wear and completely disregard advice of locals. Then Mountain Rescue risk their lives and health to get them down. Most of them volunteers no less!
I can't imagine what disservice was done. A guy hung around bears for a while, and one ate him and his girlfriend.
To the bears literally nothing happened of note.
They ate an exotic meal.
But how is it the unknown if anyone with half a brain can predict what will happen to them?
> these people actually lived in these places and experienced these things in a way the vast majority of modern humanity never will
That is true, but it is not like the only way to experience the wilderness is by being reckless. There is a ton of people enjoying this kind of thing without getting bears killed for no good reason.
Yes, you might die, but while you're alive you're really living.
I'm quite comfortable living an ordinary comfortable life and preparing in advance for novel experiences, but I'm glad some people throw caution to the wind and chance it. It takes all sorts to make the world.
You're very privileged to be able to think this way. And very naïve.
A lot of people in our world spend a lot of time trying not to die, and they don't think, "wow, this is really living" while they're scrabbling for survival.
I've been in a few situations where death was close and I don't think "wow, I was really living then".
At best I thought "well that fucking sucked", at worst I spent years recovering from PTSD.
> Yes, you might die, but while you're alive you're really living.
Now this is pod-racing.
I'm sorry you feel you've been missing out by living a safe and comfortable life, but you really haven't missed out at all.
But shit, just go skydiving or mountaineering, get this weird mindset out of your system.
There was a critical difference between these cases. Early humans grew up within nature so they had a lot of skill and knowledge. I loved Into the Wild and thought I identified with Christopher McCandless too. But the way he packed was not conducive with survival. He sadly didn’t know enough to know how much danger he put himself in.
There is a lot to mourn and a lot to learn. But there’s really nothing to celebrate - these were complicated people who behaved like they had a death wish. Early humans had a survival wish and while it didn’t always work out, the motivation was different.
Oh we all know what this was. It was someone doing something stupid and filming it. He can pretend that he was studying behavior but he broke that mirror when he started interacting with bears. This was someone creating footage in order to market that footage and support his lifestyle, no different than people in wingsuits doing dangerous stunts for clicks. Both were "experts" in the thing they were doing, right up until that thing killed them.
At least he didn't get his girlfriend eaten by a bear I suppose.
That will happen with all of us probably, whether it's a bus, a bathtub, or a senior living apartment. When I read Into the Wild I had the same feelings that this arrogant idiot deserved to die.
Now that I'm older and I can feel the heat death of me and everything I've touched I'm starting to second guess that feeling. We're all arrogant, ignorant, and selfish, and dying is going to most likely hurt no matter how it happens. Why not be a fool?
But broadly, Nassim Nicholas Taleb's work changed my thinking a bit on when I see people doing brave (and/or perhaps goddamn stupid) stuff like this. Skin in the game is powerful.
There is something to be said for -- "as long as you're ONLY putting yourself in harm's way, do your thing."
Again, I think playing around with bears is dumb as all hell, but for (an admittedly different) example, I no longer make fun of the Lifelock guy. Went from idiot to hero in my book.
Wow, really.
Supertramp wasn't "going outside the comfort zone of normies", he was making very bad, very stupid decisions that inflicted suffering on those he loved.
Oh, and the people who had to recover his corpse.
Yeah, fuck those normies and their "maps" and "bushcraft relevant to their ecosystem", this guy was the real deal huh.
No point in learning from others, just wing it and die a pointless needless death.
> I think it's worth exploring and celebrating.
I feel that this points to a certain existential angst you may be feeling, but please let me assure you that dying alone and scared like these two munters is not the way to resolve it.
And for the love of all that's holy, please stop romanticising selfish idiots.
The only nice thing I can say about Supertramp is that he didn't directly endanger anyone else, unlike the guy who got his girlfriend eaten by bears.
Except this isn't really true. Humans throughout history are invariably tribal, not solitary. Their solitary pursuits are in many ways profoundly modern and in keeping with the entire tradition of solipsistic modernity.
> these people actually lived in these places and experienced these things in a way the vast majority of modern humanity never will.
But...so? The same could be said if they moved to any developing country (I live in a developing country) but nobody is valorising that in the same way.
When we finally get our shit together and send people to Mars despite that being a one-way trip, I'm glad there will be volunteers who will sign up for that and go be pioneers. I hope they get a school named after them.
So here's what they did: they formed a group and worked together. You might even call it "society".
Good point though!