Come the era of civil rights a good number of these pools were closed down and filled in rather than allow mixed race swimming.
"White flight", redlining, and other economic pressures worked to keep new community pools coming into place in black neighbourhoods.
https://www.buffalo.edu/ubnow/stories/2019/07/wolcott-segreg...
> and black families were generally less able to afford paid swimming lessons for their children.
Nearly everbody I know swims, black, white, etc. but I'm not sure very many had paid swimming lessons.
With accessable pools and beaches the swimming part comes along with people being in the water.
If their fear kept them away from water forever, it would serve them well enough I guess... the problem is, if you don't get kids swimming young then when they get older they will probably push through the fear on their own to fit in during social situation rather than in an instructional context where somebody is prepared to help them through the learning process safely. That's how you get teenagers jumping into pools during pool parties and immediately starting to drown.
At what age did the training start? I reckon training must have started far too late (read my comment about me getting used to the water about the same time I learned to walk).
I've not thought about it before because over here one just assumes someone can swim (with the caveat/possible exception of some tourists and migrants).
You'd think the first step in solving the problem would be to figure out why kids here take easily to water and the ones your way less so. Perhaps the answer is known and I've just not heard about it.
I understand how the lack of amenities, public pools etc., would seriously disadvantage kids and would set back their leaning to swim. What is less clear is why families would actually need to pay for swimming lessons. When I was growing up in Australia swimming was so ubiquitous that what we kids didn't learn from our parents we almost picked up by osmosis — immersion with other kids in the water, etc.
That's not to say kids weren't taught, they were but by that time most kids already had basic water skills, dog-paddling, treading water etc. Thus teaching was aimed at perfecting the correct stroke for the different swimming styles, the crawl, breaststroke, backstroke, sidestroke, etc. and it was taught at school. The thought of paying for swimming lessons would have been completely foreign to most of us (professional swimming teachers would have been reserved for those in competition such as the Olympics).
Why isn't swimming a compulsory part of school sport? If it were then all kids would be taught at least the basics.
>>Every day, there are nearly 10 accidental drownings in the U.S., according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). That’s 3,500 people every year who die in water. Within these numbers is a startling fact: the fatal-drowning rate of Black/African-American children is three times higher than white children.
Careful, your source says that the rate, not the number, is 3x. There are some stats where it is actually 3x the raw number, in which case you know you have found a really crazy disparity given different group sizes.
> The district counters that the old model of cohort schools for highly capable students is highly inequitable. For decades, highly capable programs across the country, like SPS’, served a small number of Black, Latino, Indigenous, Alaskan and Pacific Islander and low-income students and taught more white and Asian students. In the 2022-23 school year, 52% of highly capable students at SPS were white, 16% were Asian, and 3.4% were Black.
https://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/why-seattle-publi...