I'm sure that a lot of dislike from low cost airlines comes from shitty OTAs rather than the airlines themselves.
I'm sure that a lot of dislike from low cost airlines comes from shitty OTAs rather than the airlines themselves.
I recently tried to use Expedia to book a flight from Vancouver to Toronto on Porter Airlines because then I could use my TD Reward points.
The default prices that showed up in the results looked the same on Expedia or directly on Porter, so it didn't seem like I was losing anything.
Except that base flight included no carry-on and no checked-baggage, which I needed to do. On Porter directly fixing that cost an extra $40. Expedia said it cost $60.
For this particular flight I also needed to be able to make changes after booking. On Porter that increased the cost by $100. On Expedia, $150.
I still did it, cuz, y'know - points. But I shook my fist at Expedia the entire time.
Pros of Expedia:
- they have my card
- their website does not suck as much as the airline’s
- they let me cancel within 24/48 hours for free and immediately
The second point can be a huge selling point and it applies to a lot of OTAs. Every time I try to book direct “because it’s best” I easily spend triple the time and sometimes I get fleeced anyway (oh, here’s a $5 convenience fee for using a credit card we don’t like) > Every time I try to book direct “because it’s best” I easily spend triple the time
I have a similar experience. As a result, I have not booked a flight directly on the carrier's website in years. Do only suckers use the carrier's website now, because the prices and/or service are always worse? Sigh.