Would the comparison not be human drivers? If it's 99% percent reliable I would say that's far safer than humans and makes far more sense already? What am I missing
Self driving needs to get down to 1 intervention in 200k miles to match the average 20 year old. They have a long way to go.
https://www.friedmansimon.com/faqs/how-common-are-car-accide...
You can not just go around asserting comparative advantage when your baseline is so far off it is farcical.