I know I’m ignorant and I’m happy the project exists, but the usability in the era where devs expect streamlined APIs is not great.
I ended up using some free project that had pre-transformed osm data for what i needed.
I know I’m ignorant and I’m happy the project exists, but the usability in the era where devs expect streamlined APIs is not great.
I ended up using some free project that had pre-transformed osm data for what i needed.
I've also downloaded planet.osm before and parsed it on my desktop with iirc osmosis. Never used that format or tool anywhere else but it's not like OSM has so many competitors offering you large amounts of geospatial data in a freely usable way. What do you considered established mechanisms for this?
For literally single point, on the map icons on the right, one is arrow with question mark ("Query features"). With this you can click on single features and get their data.
That seems close enough to "the proper way". The OSM core devs can concentrate on providing the data in the format that existing OSM front ends are optimised to work with; if you want it transformed into some other popular format then it's great that the ecosystem already has free projects that will do that for you.
Looks pretty sensible to me?