It can join this one: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26439832/
The obvious major caveat is that mice are not people, and that mouse models of what someone thinks are Alzheimer’s-like diseases are not people with Alzheimer’s.
The obvious major caveat is that mice are not people, and that mouse models of what someone thinks are Alzheimer’s-like diseases are not people with Alzheimer’s.
Come back after clinical trials.
Breakthroughs in Alzheimer's seems like the medical equivalent of breakthroughs in battery tech.
The paper itself and the article on it both state it is in mouse models of disease within their titles.
Seems like many here bring up this point for no reason other than to repeat it over and over as a low-effort dismissal. It is exhausting to read these threads.
At the moment I am writing this, there is only a single comment about the actual article.
Alzheimer's treatments today maybe slow cognitive decline by 3 months and cost a fortune.