You used the median, I used the mean. I think the latter is more useful here, but regardless, even using the median, that ratio is still god awful and not liveable.
You didn't cite numbers. But if anything the "mean" in a long tail signal like urban incomes is going to be much *higher* than the median, which cuts in my direction, not yours. But if you want to post numbers I'm happy to have the discussion I mentioned.
you are right, I was looking at something outdated. However, I think the ratio is still bad enough that it doesn’t matter to my original point.
this chain of discussion is hilarious because each step just gets worse