> what, IYO, is the meme here? The rent to income ratio is not remotely disputable
It... is. You said it had a certain value. I disputed that and gave numbers.
> Are you claiming that a 1:2 rent to income ratio in a high cost of living state is actually fine?
No, I'm claiming it's not 1:1, which is what you said the first time. Also that it's not outrageously out of scale with the rest of the country (which pays less rent but makes significantly less) or historical data (housing used to be cheaper, but only by about 30% over 50 years or thereabouts).
The "meme" is basically that The Economy Is Terrible And We Are Going To Hell In A Handbasket. And that's wrong. Something are more expensive, housing among them. Other things (travel, entertainment) are much cheaper. And as those tradeoffs change (slowly) the demographic distributions change (slowly). There's nothing new here, this is how things have always worked.
Your great great grandparents moved west in caravans for precisely the same reason: real estate was cheaper in the frontier!