This would get close to python try/catch with even lighter syntax.
This would cut so much boilerplate hand carrying error up the stack.
func must(err error) {
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
}
func must1[T any](v T, err error) T {
must(err)
return v
}
func maybeError() (bool, error) { ... }
result := must1(maybeError())
So this is why I don't care that much about having a syntax sugar for this operation anymore in Go.
In fact, this is the opposite of error handling. In any serious application this might be worse than ignoring errors
Similar to an uncaught exception in other languages. And yes, I will not use this on production applications or libraries, I mostly use this in scripts where this kind of thing makes sense.