It’s like reading the works of the mediaeval scholars, but we share mor social context with him.
PS. "Algebraic Theology" now that sounds peculiar.-
... why not express DD-aproved concepts in "His" notation? Perfect sense.-
And goddesses (no quotes) if you take Ramanujan seriously :)
Sorry to hijack this convo with “Chalcogenic Rheology”, aka self-healing glasses, aka “Vitreous Punk”*
https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-developed-glass...
https://phys.org/news/2024-07-glass-microscopic-defects-reve...
*Seeing who convo-initiator is, also getting reminded I need to work on that gvicino summary..
Paying lipservice to the original intent though, the notation may be post-1945, but the exercise is completely early modern. What would be a worked example towards a modern Algebraic Theology?
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00407-023-00319-9
Nicely brought up. Nice catch.-
For example, Namagiri might ask Narasimha to disembowel that person, neither colleague nor rival, using a mike that is neither free of feedback nor delivers adequate volume, who is neither asking a question nor making a statement, yet commenting upon something that was neither in the slides nor part of the presentation...
(Though, i note en passant its unfashionable to name your son “Apollo” in the angle world)
> the truth of [Phaeton] lies in the occurrence of a shifting of the bodies in the heavens which move round the earth, and a destruction of the things on the earth by fierce fire, which recurs at long intervals.
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Plat.+Tim.+22
Tangent: “O Solon, Solon, you Greeks are always children: there is not such a thing as an old Greek.” — can we think of any nations to which this stereotype is applied in our time?
- https://www.brookings.edu/articles/watch-out-for-false-claim...
... basically, the mere existence of fakes, of lies, allows people to claim truths to be lies.-
PS. The case above is kind of like an inversion of that.-
> Now a resolute critic of the "lying" press, Long established his own newspaper in March 1930...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huey_Long#:~:text=Now%20a%20re...
Want to add that I like Rao’s syndromes better as he highlights the asymmetry — the weird are, from “intuition”/“experience”, outnumbered by the hypernormal. A bit like the apparent asymmetry between insurance & gambling. But I’m not sure that asymmetry helps to characterize the Cultural conflicts any better than the Apollonian/Dionysian split.
Caveat to the caveat, there was a HN post, almost claiming that everyone is weird. Should that be weakened to, “everyone could aspire to be Wojak”?
(Underrated channel, btw)
You can surely come up with something more grandiose than this from the same source material ;)
(furthermore, by non-trivial use of language they usually manage to imply things they do not actually claim; one also sees this sophistry frequently among the better sort of politician)
How on Earth ...
That doesn't mean that the books might well have been half nonsense.