Oh, indeed. You are on to something with that neologism. Totally on point. Math has always been the "language" of "God" ...
... why not express DD-aproved concepts in "His" notation? Perfect sense.-
... why not express DD-aproved concepts in "His" notation? Perfect sense.-
And goddesses (no quotes) if you take Ramanujan seriously :)
Sorry to hijack this convo with “Chalcogenic Rheology”, aka self-healing glasses, aka “Vitreous Punk”*
https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-developed-glass...
https://phys.org/news/2024-07-glass-microscopic-defects-reve...
*Seeing who convo-initiator is, also getting reminded I need to work on that gvicino summary..
Paying lipservice to the original intent though, the notation may be post-1945, but the exercise is completely early modern. What would be a worked example towards a modern Algebraic Theology?
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00407-023-00319-9
Nicely brought up. Nice catch.-
For example, Namagiri might ask Narasimha to disembowel that person, neither colleague nor rival, using a mike that is neither free of feedback nor delivers adequate volume, who is neither asking a question nor making a statement, yet commenting upon something that was neither in the slides nor part of the presentation...
(Though, i note en passant its unfashionable to name your son “Apollo” in the angle world)