> And for public channels, E2E is pointless - everyone can see it anyway.
Shouldn't it at least provide some guarantee that what you receive is what was sent?
Shouldn't it at least provide some guarantee that what you receive is what was sent?
And then there is even stuff like OMEMO, which is E2E, but intentionally does not do authentication of messages, quite the opposite: It's protocol is designed such that you can always deny having sent such a message...