It's not about the wavelength, it's about the power.
I use shorter or higher wavelengths (depends on the channel in question) to cook my food every day but my phone sure doesn't emit 700W
I use shorter or higher wavelengths (depends on the channel in question) to cook my food every day but my phone sure doesn't emit 700W
..let’s assume that a specific area of our inner body is “micro-cooked” constantly, the body will certainly try to repair that area with higher frequency and therefore there would be a higher risk of cancer, wouldn’t it?
In fact, when the healing occurs, keloid scars can form, which is a benign growth.
"No evidence needed" works if you want to be an astrologer.
Then everything causes cancer (and death really) by means of break, bruise, bump, burn, cut, prick, sprain, tear, etc.
Where evidence is needed is if you want to show a statistically significant result of your analysis that something indeed causes injury, and does it often enough to cause cancer within a person's lifetime.
Why doesn't the same damage occur when you're being blasted with 600 THz radiation (ie. visible light from your lightbulb)?
It's certainly possible that other repeated tissue damage, such as those from burns, could also be cancer causing.