Going from 1 to n tickets, isn’t necessarily wise
Going from 1 to n tickets, isn’t necessarily wise
Going by the calculator, EMV of going from buying 0 tickets to 1 is -$1.85 for Mega Millions, same as going from n to n+1; n >= 0. The first ticket is the first one you lose with, statistically.
Based on this kind of thinking, my personal rules are: never spend more than 0.1% of take-home pay per time-period buying tickets, and only buy big-prize lotto tickets that have potentially-life-changing payouts.
These massively asymmetric choices occur elsewhere in life, e.g. "asking them out on a date"; "asking for a raise", and are good to look out for.
This kind of thinking never holds up when it's a small chance of a horrible outcome.
How many lottery winners?
I'm not sure about that. There is some chance of someone random buying a ticket and gifting it to you and then that ticket winning. Not a big chance. But it is not 0.
I haven't gotten into the discrete math in many years. If you're right do you mind explaining please? I can intuit what you're getting at. 0 odds * inf < (odds with one ticket). Is that a decent description?
odd(0) = 0
odd(1) = X, so odd(1) / odd(0) = +Inf increase in odds of winning vs 0
odd(2) = 2X, so odd(2) / odd(1) = 2x increase in odds of winning vs 1
If you send me $20k of bitcoin and a UUID, I will run 'crypto.randomUUID()', and if I get the same UUID as you I'll send back $40k.
If you don't send me any money, you have 0% chance of winning, but if you do send me $20k, you have a mere 1 in 2^122 chance of winning, an infinite increase in your chance of winning, so surely it is rational to do so.
If you truly believe what you just wrote, I'll await my $20k.
But does that mean you only buy 1 lottery ever in life or one each lottery?