Why would you trust a company no-man any more than a company yes-man? They both have agendas and biases. Is it just that you personally prefer one set of biases (anti-company) more than the other (pro-company)?
However, every company yes-man is paid to be a yes-man and will speak in favor of the company without exception - that literally is the job. Otherwise they will be fired and will join the ranks of the aforementioned people.
So logically it makes more sense for me to believe the former more than the latter. The two-sides are not equivalent (as you may have alluded) in term of trustworthiness.
Mostly disappointed.
That makes it easier to trust one side over another.
If the employees fucked up then you’ll say the company still fucked up because it wasn’t managing the employees well.
And then in that situation you’ll still believe the lying employees who say its the company’s fault while leaving out their culpability.