Judging from history it's unlikely that the wealthy and powerful will give up anything voluntarily.
Judging from history it's unlikely that the wealthy and powerful will give up anything voluntarily.
ChatGPT is literally available to everyone, but yet it takes an incredible amount of brainwashing to claim these technologies are not to the benefit of the people. These are also claims made by highly privileged, highly paid, entitled coastal elites.
Go talk to a poor bangladeshi farmer and they will have a different story to tell
HN guidelines:
Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.
When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."
Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.
Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.
Your argument doesn’t prove GP’s wrong. It’s like saying that the king’s feast benefits the peasants because there was plenty of food that was thrown away that they could get their hands on.
library books, playing outside, maybe a bit of nintendo, pogs
over literally an endless source vomit from a screen with social media, youtube, instagram, reddit, facebook and twitter, now with the added benefit of being infested with AI slop
I'd take the 90s any day
The 90s had problems too (I was a teen in the early 90s) tho. Just different kinds.