> and found that only "Gab" doesn't censor its users (beyond their content policy).
... Wait, what does that mean? They don't censor, except for the censorship?
... Wait, what does that mean? They don't censor, except for the censorship?
What people normally mean when they say “free speech” is in the US first amendment sense, not in the “you can post videos of horrible crimes you’ve committed” sense.
Gabs content policy is pretty short and basically just says this. No CP and other criminal content, anything protected by first amendment is ok.
Free speech conversations tend to devolve very quickly into americentrism, which is fine until those with mass power try to impose their specific views on other countries.
In fairness, the US has about the strongest free-speech protections, so that kind of makes sense?